Tom and Will Green are sustainability strategists who help brands translate climate science into measurable action. Their work focuses on decarbonization roadmaps, supplier engagement, and transparent reporting for consumer and industrial companies.
Across consulting engagements and public initiatives, they emphasize science-based targets, lifecycle assessment, and cross-functional collaboration to reduce emissions while supporting business growth.
| Name | Role | Core Focus | Notable Projects |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tom Green | Head of Climate Strategy | Science-based target setting, policy alignment | Led ESG transformation for two Fortune 500 manufacturers |
| Will Green | Director of Sustainable Supply Chains | Supplier decarbonization, procurement frameworks | Built renewable power programs across 12 countries |
| Organization | Green Enterprise Partners | Climate risk integration, value chain engagement | Partnered with UNEP on sector guidance |
| Impact Metrics | Scope 1–3 reductions | Science Based Targets initiative validation | Average 34% emissions intensity reduction over 5 years |
Science-Based Target Methodology
Tom and Will Green emphasize rigorous target development grounded in climate scenarios aligned with the Paris Agreement. They walk organizations through boundary setting, allocation principles, and dynamic adjustment as policies evolve.
Their methodology incorporates sector-specific guidance, allowing companies to set near- and long-term targets that reflect both environmental responsibility and commercial viability.
Supplier Engagement and Collaboration
Effective supplier programs are central to their approach, combining clear expectations, capacity building, and shared incentives. Tom and Will Green facilitate supplier assessments, training, and co-investment in renewable energy and efficiency.
By aligning procurement policies with science-based milestones, companies can scale impact across tiers while managing risk and maintaining performance standards.
Lifecycle Assessment and Carbon Accounting
Robust data and transparent assumptions underpin credible decarbonization roadmaps. The team applies lifecycle assessment to quantify emissions from raw materials through end-of-life, highlighting hotspots with the greatest reduction potential.
Standardized methodologies, toolkits, and assurance processes help organizations maintain consistency, comparability, and compliance with emerging regulations.
Policy Alignment and Regulatory Strategy
Tom and Will Green track climate policy developments across jurisdictions to help organizations anticipate requirements and avoid costly retrofits. They map regulatory obligations, taxonomies, and disclosure mandates against existing sustainability programs.
By integrating policy intelligence into strategy design, companies can turn compliance into competitive advantage and accelerate investment in low-carbon innovation.
Operational Roadmap and Key Takeaways
- Set science-based targets using sector-aligned pathways and transparent boundary definitions.
- Engage suppliers through assessments, training, and shared investment in efficiency and renewables.
- Apply lifecycle assessment to prioritize hotspots and select interventions with the highest abatement potential.
- Integrate policy intelligence to anticipate regulation and turn compliance into competitive advantage.
- Implement robust data, assurance, and reporting practices to maintain credibility and meet evolving disclosure requirements.
FAQ
Reader questions
How do Tom and Will Green define a science-based target for a mid-sized manufacturer?
They apply sector-specific decarbonization pathways to align targets with a 1.5°C trajectory, setting absolute reduction goals for Scope 1 and 2 and, where feasible, Scope 3.
What are the most common gaps in supplier decarbonization programs they observe?
Many programs lack clear ownership, baseline data, and incentive structures, which Tom and Will Green address through governance frameworks and joint implementation plans.
Can lifecycle assessment really identify meaningful reduction opportunities?
Yes, by mapping emissions across material flows and processes, their assessments reveal where interventions deliver the highest impact per investment. They recommend annual or biannual reviews, with trigger-based updates when major regulations, market conditions, or technology pathways change.